16 Days of Activism Against GBV
16 Days of Activism Against Gender Based Violence (GBV) is an international, annual campaign designed to raise awareness and initiate action for the eradication of violence against women and girls in communities all around the world. During this time, Glasgow Caledonian joins a global network of organisations, including many of our colleagues within the tertiary education system, to deliver a range of activities that support our ongoing wider gender-based violence prevention and response programme of work.
Universities can have a large and lasting impact on combating GBV not only as institutes of teaching and learning but as instruments for research and analysis.
In recognition of the vital part research plays, Glasgow Caledonian presented a spotlight on GBV research for 16 Days in 2023. Each day, a research project designed to answer long-standing questions around GBV such as the causes, consequences and possible solutions were shared here and across our social media platforms. The research projects contained within this spotlight are a snapshot of the work being conducted at Glasgow Caledonian across multiple disciplines around GBV, including law, criminology, sociology and health sciences. The research showcases the power of collaboration and academia as a vehicle for change.
Research projects
DAY 1: Innovative Solutions to Eliminate Domestic Abuse
arrow_forward
Researchers: Prof Nancy Lombard and Dr Kate Butterby
The ISEDA project (Innovative Solutions to Eliminate Domestic Abuse) is a collaboration between 15 partners from nine European countries, with the main objective to combat and eliminate domestic abuse via modern technological tools and practices. Overall, the ISEDA project, employing multidisciplinary expertise and addressing the different aspects of domestic abuse, has the potential to significantly challenge domestic abuse on a European level and contribute to the establishment of the necessary robust long-lasting structures to eliminate it.
Tools to be developed (all in-progress):
Chatbot: will be designed to support victim-survivors to find information about domestic abuse, such as local support services and information on the different types. It will also be designed as a tool to store evidence such as photos and videos, which can be used in court to support a victim-survivor’s case. Police training: interactive training will be developed for police to support them to improve their recognition of and response to domestic abuse. This will be done via ‘serious game-play’, where police can respond to real-life situations, making decisions throughout the training which influence the overall outcome for a victim-survivor. Campaigns and education programmes: campaigns will be developed via informational guides, posters and videos, and education programmes for schools will focus on deconstructing toxic gender stereotypes and promoting healthy relationships. Perpetrator programmes: promotion and implementation of perpetrator programs as an alternative to imprisonment and a chance for positive change. GCU is involved across the work packages We have conducted focus groups and interviews with victim-survivors, third-sector organisations and police to explore the potential uses for technology (such as a chatbot) to support victim-survivors.
We have completed a literature review exploring the use of technology within the gender-based violence field, which is being used to inform the development of the chatbot. Part of this task involved developing protocol relating to the ethics of using technological tools We also developed an evaluation protocol which will be rolled out to chatbot users during the pilot.
DAY 2: Justice for Image-Based Sexual Abuse: exploring experiences, harms, and justice understandings of victim-survivors in Scotland
arrow_forward
Researcher: Julia Zauner, GCU
Key objectives:
Impacts: Examine the nature and impacts if IBSA victimisation and how these intertwine with experiences of sexism, cissexism, and heterosexist Disclosure: Explore factors that influence victim-survivors’ decision to (not) disclose or report incidents Criminal Justice System: Identify strengths and shortcomings of current criminal justice responses Justice: Understand victim-survivors’ understandings and experiences of justice and the meanings they attach to them Policy and Training: Develop policy recommendations and training for support organisations, law enforcement agencies, and policy makers to improve understandings, prevention, and detection of, and responses to IBSA This doctoral research project explores victim-survivors' experiences with non-consensual taking, creating, sharing, threatening to share, & receiving intimate images in Scotland. This includes harms suffered, experiences (or lack thereof) with the CJS, and justice needs. As the first study in Scotland, it aims to offer crucial policy and practice recommendations, fostering both academic and social impacts.
If you have experienced image-based abuse in Scotland and would like to share your story, you can fill out this survey
DAY3: Hostile environments? Exploring gender and class in relation to sexual violence
arrow_forward
Researchers: Dr Karen Lorimer (PI) and Prof Lesley McMillan
This qualitative study sought to give voice to the perspectives and experiences of working-class women who have experienced sexual violence.
This project addressed the knowledge gap that exists regarding working-class women’s experiences of sexual violence.
We spoke to 19 working-class women In Scotland about their experiences, including if they have disclosed their experience of sexual violence and the nature of responses (whether from friends or professionals).
Many women believed working-class women are treated as bodies that hold no value, as objects to castigate or dismiss. Women described being dismissed, feeling unheard and unappreciated, which created an unwillingness to place trust in systems of perceived further oppression, including engaging with health professionals to disclose sexual violence. As this project reaches an end, the research team will share their findings widely, and hold creative sessions to spark discussions about gender and class. See the project website for more information. You can also contact us via email .
DAY 4: Responding to and Preventing Gendered-Harms on Online Platforms: Experiences and Perspectives of Discord’s Trust and Safety Team
arrow_forward
Researchers: Julia Zauner, GCU; and Ben Collier, University of Edinburgh
Key objectives:
Conceptualising Harms: Explore how trust and safety teams understand online gendered-harms. Responsibility and Responsibilisation: Highlight the continual tension between platform responsibility and responsibilising particularly women to not get harmed in online spaces. Online Justice: Explore the differences and similarities of community, corporation-led, and criminal justice in online communities responding to gendered-harms. Trust and Safety Training: Develop training for trust and safety teams and wider online platforms to support their efforts to prevent and respond to online gendered-harms. Policy: Develop policy recommendations for online platforms to improve prevention and detection of, and responses to online gendered-harms This study explores experiences of Discord’s Trust & Safety team conceptualising, preventing, and responding to gendered harms (e.g. gendered hate speech, online harassment, image-based abuse etc.) on the online platform. It further highlights diverse justice approaches and aims to contribute to training and policy for online platforms to enhance responses to gendered-harms.
DAY 5: Failure to protect? The lived experiences of “non-offending carers” co-parenting with internet-assisted child sex offenders.
arrow_forward
Researcher: Naomi McGookin
Key findings:
The co-parents of internet-based child sex offenders are usually women who are subsequently categorised as the “non-offending carer” or NOC in the existing literature base and by statutory services such as police and social work who become involved with the family following the arrest of an alleged offender. These women are unaware of their partners offences until the “Knock” whereby the police raid their houses for technology and make arrests. Where there are children in the house, social work will often investigate for potential sexual abuse and the children are usually subject to child protection proceedings. These events are traumatic for the whole family and it is the mother (i.e the non-offending carer) who is responsible for facilitating these investigations and ensuring her children are protected from potential harm at the hands of her (ex)partner. Women who have children with online child sex offenders serve a parallel sentence along with their co-parent through no fault of their own as they experience post-traumatic stress symptoms, reduced income, community and familial isolation, fear of vigilante activity, threats to personal safety and doxxing. Statutory support for family members of online offenders is minimal and social work services often are suspicious of partners. There is no national guidance for practitioners to consistently and accurately assess the risk to the children of online offenders and so the “non-offending carer” is often given sole responsibility of supervising all contact between their (ex)partner and their children until the children turn 16. This Participatory Action Research project was co-produced alongside four women with lived experience of co-parenting with online offenders. We used a mixture of research methods such as Photovoice, poetry and vignette to capture the experiences of “The Knock”, the aftermath and the continuing impact their (ex)partners offending has had on the lives of them and their children. These entries were displayed at two separate exhibitions for MSPs, policy makers, practitioners and educators. It is hoped that these exhibits were able to raise awareness of the experiences of family members and that the stories shared by these women will continue to generate conversations and changes in practice with those working with and around family members of sex offenders.
DAY 6: Women’s Lived Experiences of Coercive Control, Stalking and Related Crimes, as they progress
arrow_forward
Researchers: Professor Nancy Lombard and Dr Katy Proctor Glasgow Caledonian University
Key points:
Women described positive and negative experiences during each stage of their journey through the criminal justice system. Both negative and positive incidents were related to individual actors and incidents within each agency as opposed to specific agencies being responsible for all good or all bad experiences. Women described repeatedly, how they felt the criminal justice system allows and facilitates the perpetrators abusive behaviour to continue. The dynamics of coercive control and associated crimes need to be fully understood by all personnel and ways found to highlight how evidence is applicable within such a pattern of abuse rather than as individual incidents. Negative experiences were associated with lack of communication and delays to progress. When this happened, women were more likely to feel controlled by both the system and their abusers. Women described the significant amount of practical and bureaucratic work they had to engage in to keep their cases ‘live’. This includes investigation and gathering evidence, record keeping, and maintaining the visibility of their case within the system which we have identified as ‘Justice Work’ (see Lombard and Proctor, forthcoming). This research project shows the criminal justice system can be a source of empowerment and disempowerment for women reporting domestic abuse, stalking and associated behaviours. It is however imperative that it provides forms of justice where women feel supported, acknowledged and safe as well as having their experiences named and validated by the system. When this fails, women can feel that the abuse, power and control they have escaped from is simply replicated by a system that should be there to help them.
Link to full report
Link to animation
DAY 7: Understanding sexual violence among young people
arrow_forward
Researchers: Professor Lesley McMillan, Dr Maureen Taylor and Julia Zauner
This project aims to improve our understandings of young people’s relationship experiences, navigation of risk, online and offline communication and experiences of sexual harm and violence.
Understanding: to establish what is and is not known about young people’s experiences of intimate relationships, their development, methods of communication, perceptions of risk and experience of sexual harm and violence in their local context Methodology: Using focus groups and interviews with young people age 16 and over living in Ayrshire and Arran, we will utilise social network analysis to understand the social context in which relationships develop and where sexual harms may occur. This will allow an understanding of he dynamics of connectedness, or dis-connectedness, that lead to harm. Policy and practice: By identifying areas of risk we seek to establish opportunities for contextual safeguarding and disruption of potential harm and violence in the local context in which young people live
DAY 8: Campaign for Complainer Anonymity
arrow_forward
Researchers: Dr Andrew Tickell, Senior Lecturer in Law; Seonaid Stevenson-McCabe, Lecturer in Law; GCU law students
People often think you have an “automatic legal right to lifelong anonymity in the UK” if you disclose you’ve been the victim of a sexual offence. This is true in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It isn’t true in Scotland. People reporting sexual crime currently have no legal right to anonymity under Scots law.
Our campaign: We set out to change this, working with GCU law students to raise consciousness of this gap in the law, persuade policymakers of the need for change, and research international best practice. Our research: We looked at how twenty different jurisdictions – including Ireland, India, Australia, Canada, Bangladesh and New Zealand – deal with anonymity rules in the social media age. Our key priorities for law reform: Legal certainty. Respecting the autonomy of survivors of sexual violence and their decisions about whether or to share their experiences in public. Ensuring the law doesn’t create new barriers or impose new social or economic costs on survivors of sexual violence to secure or waive their anonymity. The change: In 2023, the Scottish Government incorporated proposals based on our research into the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill. If the Bill is passed, complainers will finally have an automatic legal right to lifelong anonymity in Scotland and will be free to waive this anonymity – if they choose to.
DAY 9: An investigation of women’s experiences of online harassment and abuse during online activism related to violence against women and girls
arrow_forward
Researcher: Erin Rennie
Key objectives:
To investigate the forms and extent of online harassment and abuse that women experience in response to their online VAWG activism. To analyse the psychological, emotional, and social impacts of online harassment and abuse. To explore women’s responses to online harassment and abuse and how they navigate the online space during/after abuse. To explore women’s freedom to engage with the online space and their continued participation with feminist activism. This research aims to explore women’s experiences of online harassment and abuse encountered during online VAWG activism, with a focus on how this impacts women, their responses and how this influences their continued engagement with the online space and activism. Online harassment and abuse against women includes - but is not limited to - sexualised and gendered slurs, threats, hacking, sexual harassment, doxing and virtual rape. Online abuse is an extension of, rather than separate to, offline inequalities and is part of the continuum of violence women experience in their lives. To explore this, an online survey and interviews were conducted with 312 women involved in online VAWG activism. Key themes include visibility and vulnerability, resilience and resistance, online safety work, and feminist digilantism.
DAY 10: Understanding Domestic Homicide in Scotland
arrow_forward
Researcher: Professor Lesley McMillan, Dr Maureen Taylor (both GCU) and Dr Rachel McPherson (University of Glasgow)
A collaborative project working with policing, public sector and third sector partners to more fully understand domestic homicide of women, the patterns of behaviour that precede it, the challenges it presents in terms of prevention, and the opportunities that may exist for safeguarding.
Key objectives:
Pilot study: Undertake an in-depth qualitative study of domestic homicide in Scotland Partnership: Using a co-production approach to build a meaningful community of practice around domestic homicide in Scotland Methodology: Establish a robust methodology for case file analysis to identify patterns and themes about preceding events Policy and Practice: Identify risk, points of potential intervention, and implications for practice The funder’s logo is below – two options for format. And University of Glasgow logo below too.
DAY 11: Sexual offence lawyering in Scotland: Improving our adversarial system
arrow_forward
Researcher: Seonaid Stevenson-McCabe
Key objectives:
To understand the attitudes of legal professionals involved in sexual offence trials as to how these trials are conducted; To understand the strategies adopted by legal professionals in conducting and managing sexual offence trials; To consider whether changes are required to improve adversarial sexual offence trials and consider what this may involve. There has been significant law reform in recent decades in sexual offence cases seeking to improve the system, and further reform is proposed. Research with complainers has suggested that providing evidence in sexual offence cases can be traumatic for them. Appeal Court judgments in recent years have also suggested there are problems in the ways in which sexual offence cases are conducted.
However, there is very little research in the Scottish context with lawyers themselves, exploring how potential problems could be addressed by the lawyers involved in this process.
The aim of this research is to understand the attitudes of Scottish sexual offence lawyers and the strategies they use, with a view to exploring how our adversarial system could be improved.
DAY 12: The Challenges of Sexual Assault Forensic Medical Service Provision in Rural Scotland and Ontario, Canada
arrow_forward
Researchers: Dr Andrea Quinlan (University of Waterloo), Professor Lesley McMillan (GCU), Dr Gethin Rees, Professor Deborah White
The project explores the challenges around forensic medical examination and care following sexual violence in rural and remote areas of Scotland and Ontario, Canada. Funded but the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHR).
Understanding: The project will gain insights about the issues and challenges of medico-legal interventions for rape and sexual assault in non-urban settings Co-production & Forging Connections: Using a co-production approach, working with partners, in Scotland and Canada to gain insight into the experiences of front-line professionals working in post-sexual assault care, and forging connections among and between practitioners and academics. World Café Method: using creative methods to facilitate discussion around key questions of access, delivery and care including words, drawing and imagery generating both written and visual outputs Policy and Practice: Generating insight to improve service provision and overcome barriers and improve the experiences of victim-survivors in rural areas
DAY 13: Group associated child sexual exploitation: Exploring the networks
arrow_forward
Researcher: Dr Maureen Taylor
Key findings:
There is no single typology of child sexual exploitation While child sexual exploitation may be connected to serious organised crime, child sexual exploitation may be better described as ‘crime that is organised’. Child sexual exploitation committed by groups of men against individual or multiple female victims is typified by the routine activities and everyday associations between victims and offenders that facilitate child sexual exploitation The locus of power in child sexual exploitation networks is determined by an offender’s connections to people and places. For victims, these connections may create or exacerbate vulnerability to exploitation and harm Social network analysis can provide an effective tool for law enforcement in identifying opportunities for disruption and safeguarding in child sexual exploitation networks. This doctoral research filled a gap in evidence about the nature of group-associated child sexual exploitation. Using social network analysis, it reconstructed and thematically analysed seven child sexual exploitation networks in England.
DAY 14: Will proposals to reform the criminal law to address misogyny be an effective response to the public harassment young women face in Scotland?
arrow_forward
Researcher: Lucy Mackay
Key objectives:
Through interviews, gain an understanding of young women’s experiences of public misogynistic harassment in Scotland, particularly focused on descriptive experiences and harms Through focus groups, gain an understanding of young women’s desired justice responses to public misogynistic harassment Address a gap in current research feeding into the Misogyny and Criminal Justice proposals Public misogynistic harassment, including behaviour such as catcalling, staring, groping, non-consensual conversation and sexual comments, is overwhelmingly experienced by young women. This type of behaviour is proposed to be addressed, to some extent, by the Scottish Governments Misogyny and Criminal Justice proposals. My research aims to better understand young women’s experiences of this harassment, such as how they define it for themselves, the harms it causes, and how they would want it to be tackled. This will be fed into an analysis of the proposals to determine how effective they will be in tackling this phenomenon.
DAY 15: Exploring and Evaluating the Domestic Abuse Disclosure Scheme for Scotland
arrow_forward
Researcher: Prof Lesley McMillan
The Domestic Abuse Disclosure Scheme for Scotland (DSDAS) allows individuals the ‘right to ask’ whether their partner, or the partner of someone they are concerned about, has a history of domestic abuse, and for this information to be disclosed to the person in the relationship, or someone best placed to safeguard them. This project is the first to explore the DSDAS scheme and how it is experienced by those who engage with it as a member of the public or a professional.
Key information:
Understanding: The project seeks to improve our understanding of the operation of the DSDAS scheme and how it is experienced by those who engage with it or are involved as professionals, and it’s role in the prevention of domestic abuse. Methodology: the project methodology involves a critical policy analysis of the scheme guidance and documents, in-depth interviews with three groups: police officers who administer the scheme; those in support services who have supported survivors who have used the scheme; and people who have requested information through the disclosure scheme, received information from it, or considered using the scheme but decided not to. Policy and Practice: The project findings will improve our understanding of the scheme, what works well, and what might be improved with a view to informing policy and practice in domestic abuse prevention. If you have used the disclosure scheme as an applicant, received information through that you did not ask for, or have considered using it but did not for some reason, and would be interested in participating in an interview with the research team, please follow this link for further information.
DAY 16: The Missing and Imagined Perpetrator in Rape Prevention Efforts
arrow_forward
Researchers: Prof Lesley McMillan (GCU) Professor Deborah White (Trent University, Canada)
This project analyses sexual violence initiatives such as awareness raising campaigns, self-defence training, promotion of technologies such as rape alarms, and education-based efforts such as bystander intervention and consent workshops. It explores how perpetrators are represented within these efforts concluding they are often missing, and when they are present, they are imagined in particular ways.
Prevention initiatives:
Self-defence: While self-defence may be empowering for individual women, particularly feminist-informed self-defence, it is largely women who have to develop self-protective physical capabilities, psychological, emotional and social transformations to prevent sexual violence against them, rather than perpetrators being the focus. Bystander Prevention: Bystander intervention largely targets the behaviours and responses of the community as a whole, and while it is the case that everyone has a role to play in prevention, it does not directly address the behaviour of the perpetrator themselves. The message most often is not ‘do not commit sexual violence’ but ‘stop others from committing sexual violence’. Anti-rape technologies: The majority of so-called anti-rape technologies target women and responsibilise them for their own protection. These include anti-rape nail polish, wearables with communication technology such as jewellery, and mobile phone apps. These are mainly marketed to women, and often represent perpetrators as strangers in public spaces which is not representative of the most common assault situations which is known men. Public Safety Campaigns: Campaigning is a key part of the anti-sexual violence movement, seeking to raise public awareness, and feminist campaigns challenge prevailing myths. However a number of campaigns target women’s behaviours rather than perpetrators’ actions, suggest women should alter their behaviour to prevent sexual assault. While a range speak to the behaviours of perpetrators, these are often the minority. Prevention work needs to target the behaviour of perpetrators, and raise awareness among the public of the forms it can take and the harms it causes. Any awareness raising aimed at victim-survivors need to focus on helping people name the harms they have experienced and providing support.
Course of conduct research: 'Gemma's story'
Watch this animation made from the testimonies of many women gathered for a Glasgow Caledonian research on Gender-based violence.
Further information, advice and support The University is dedicated to identifying and tackling inappropriate behaviour, whenever it arises. No one in our community should ever be the focus of gender based violence, sexism, racism, discrimination, assault, bullying, harassment or any other offensive conduct.
Students and staff can find out about more gender-based and sexual violence support within the University and externally.
Fearless Glasgow
The Erase the Grey campaign - launched by GCU - has key messages which challenge stereotypical attitudes and behaviours and reiterates a zero-tolerance policy towards gender-based violence.
Learn more arrow_forward
Erase the Grey
The Erase the Grey campaign - launched by GCU - has key messages which challenge stereotypical attitudes and behaviours and reiterates a zero-tolerance policy towards gender-based violence.
Learn more arrow_forward